More biology articles in the 'Health & Medicine' category

In diverse ecosystems, packed with wildly different species, evolution whizzes along. As different species accumulate mutations, some adapt particularly well to their environment and prosper. It happens in marine sediments, mountain forests – and, as a new study illustrates, in precancerous tumors, too.

In a study published online today in Nature Genetics, Carlo Maley, Ph.D., a researcher at The Wistar Institute, and his colleagues report that precancerous tumors containing a population of highly diverse cells were more likely to evolve into cancer than those containing genetically similar cells. The finding suggests that, in at least some forms of cancer, the more genetically diverse a precancerous tumor is, the more likely that tumor is to progress to full-blown cancer. If so, genetic diversity might act as a biomarker for cancer risk among patients with precancerous tissues.

"Although researchers first defined cancer in evolutionary terms in the 1970s, few researchers have actually studied the disease this way," says Maley, lead author on the study and an assistant professor in the molecular and cellular oncogenesis program at Wistar. "We wanted to know: If we measured a precancerous tumor's genetic diversity at baseline, could we predict who would go on to get cancer?"

To find out, the scientists decided to analyze data on a precancerous condition called Barrett's esophagus, in which cells lining the lower esophagus change due to repeated exposure to stomach acid from reflux, a condition often referred to as heartburn. Doctors typically adopt a "wait and watch" approach to treating patients with Barrett's esophagus because the condition only rarely leads to cancer and is difficult to treat surgically.

In the study, Maley and colleagues analyzed precancerous tumor data from 268 patients, including multiple biopsies within each tumor. On average, these patients were followed for 4.4 years, during which time 37 developed cancerous tumors. Overall, the database used in the study represents more than 32,000 distinct genotypes of different cells within the tumors.

Using computational techniques to analyze the data, the researchers calculated measures of diversity inside the tumors. Essentially, they counted cell varieties and measured the genetic difference, or divergence, between those varieties. "Simply put, we took ecology measures of species diversity and translated them into measures of cell diversity within tumors," Maley says. The found a striking correlation between increased diversity of tumor cells and progression to cancer. For every additional cell variety detected in a tumor, the patient was twice as likely to progress to cancer.

Maley suggests that genetically diverse tumors have a high probability of generating mutant cells that will flourish and spread, allowing the tumor to transform and grow. In the future, in addition to serving as a biomarker for cancer risk, he adds, measures of genetic diversity might help doctors assess the success of cancer prevention therapies.

In fact, he speculates, genetic diversity among tumor cells might help explain why therapy sometimes fails. If a tumor contains a diverse population of cells, some of those cells are more likely to resist treatment, Maley says. Adapting to and surviving chemotherapy, these resistant cells could breed, leading to a cancer relapse. He hopes to pursue this hypothesis in the future. "More immediately," he adds, "we intend to validate the new study with other cohorts and other types of tumors."

Source : The Wistar Institute

(unregistered) writes:

Dr. Carlo Maley’s study highlights the fundamental problem of cancer, tumor cell evolution.

Cancer is a hugely diverse, unpredictable, stochastic process that results from evolution inside the body. Patients with cancer routinely face the reality of rapid tumor cell evolution. Drug resistance develops and increasingly aggressive cancer cells emerge. Combination chemotherapy was developed to prevent drug resistance and has led to major cure rates for a number of cancers including leukemia, lymphoma, and testicular cancer. Increasing the number and dose of drugs can improve the response rate, the complete remission rate and the cure rate. However, toxicity has precluded the routine cure of most cancers. Approximately 570,000 Americans died of cancer in 2005. Major changes at the scientific and organizational levels are needed to end this carnage.

I would like to call readers attention to an editorial titled, Evolution and the Treatment of Cancer posted by the Van Adel Research Institute:
http://www.vai.org/upload/departments/tumormetastasis/editorial01.pdf
The editorial examines requirements for the specific destruction of an evolutionary population of malignant cells, and proposes a major non-profit initiative to develop a set of drugs that satisfies these requirements – the Cure Cancer Project.

Signers on the editorial include: Dr. Emil Frei, III, Dr. Lawrence A. Loeb, Dr. Arthur C. Upton, Dr. Craig Webb, Dr. Harvey I. Pass, Dr. Michael Liebman, Dr. Richard I. Somiari, Dr. Henry Heng, and Dr. Bernie Crespi.
Thank you for the opportunity to share this with you. Arnold Glazier M.D.

08/05/2006 10:38 am

Login

Username
Password
Remember me
Not yet part of the community?

Register Now!

March 27, 2006 04:14 PMHealth & Medicine



Search Bio News Net


Free Biology Newsletter